Voglio inaugurare il blog con una riflessione sul tema della sostituzione Construction of Tor Bella Monaca raised recently by the mayor Alemanno. The issue is very delicate and calls into question some of the most important nodes of Roman.
One can not help feel a certain awe to the statements made by the mayor in recent days.
On the net you can easily find the former of these statements cursus start by recognizing that "Tor Bella Monaca be demolished and rebuilt" because "the houses are crumbling and it rains inside" and the neighborhood is a dangerous "in the tissue cyst Social. Alemanniana The ultimate solution would be to "demolish the neighborhood rebuilding in the open areas next to a more human architecture of small houses and yards as the Garbatella" everything "without consuming more agro romano". And already there is some contradiction here.
From a visit to Paris, the mayor also said to want to look at the famous Defense as a model for the Roman suburbs, with wide boulevards and spaces that are impossible to realize in the middle. The mayor added that the center of Rome must have "the best of tradition" while the suburbs "the greatest of modernity." From the Defense Garbatella So, while a few months ago there was talk of a referendum for the construction of the tallest skyscrapers in the suburbs of St. Peter. "Someone stop Alemanno" headline this post on the topic of Friends degradoesquilino.com.
Now, which is a suburb Tor Bella Monaca degradata e pericolosa non ci sono dubbi. Non conosco lo stato delle case e non saprei dire se ci piove dentro, ce lo dirà chi ci vive.
Troppe cose di questo proclama estivo però mi lasciano perplesso. Sono un grande sostenitore del fatto che Roma abbia bisogno di sostituzione edilizia. Ma non certo a scapito di ulteriore occupazione di suolo pubblico. Togliamo le torri e facciamo le casette coi giardini, tanto per buttare un altro po' di agro romano. Io semmai toglierei le casette basse per verticalizzare. E usare lo spazio lasciato libero per parchi e servizi. Qualche mese fa si parlava di referendum sui grattacieli a roma...che fine ha fatto?
E se proprio c'è una pregiudiziale urbanistico/morale contro le torri residenziali, ci sono molte valide alternatives. First of all
densification. And 'know that Rome is a city scattered, making it more difficult to organize an efficient mobility and service management and not least the isolation of the suburbs. Then it would pulverize some beautiful tower at Tor Bella Monaca to build human-scale neighborhoods around the station Tiburtina or Quintiliani or Teano Graden and future of metro C for example, over the disused railway stations, close to underground FR2 or FR3. Also
Rome recently received from the state property of barracks and other similar areas that are well suited to building replacement projects (perhaps in the sense sustainable) or new functions.
All this provided that the residents agree. The social impact of moving the suburbs in the most central and most important would be served. A healthy urban and social fabric could help the "cell" sick to get back into a virtuous circle of disemarginazione. But this is light years away from politics "expulsion" of Aleman. The problem is the marginalization of the periphery, the ghetto.
do not know who of you has never been a Tor Bella Monaca. I do. There is a nice theater veltroniana institution under the direction of Michele Placido, in which I participated in the awarding of a literary competition. Commendable initiative no doubt about it. But frankly I do not know how many residents have participated in the representations over the years. In fact, with the timely settlement of Alemanno came the withdrawal of funds. The problem is the idea of \u200b\u200ba certain left of "fall" from thinking about changing the culture of the people. But I think we should rather encourage the development of those instances of change or excitement in every fabric of society even the most degraded and then starting from the bottom. I am reminded in this connection the troubled history of the Park Centocelle. Great battles for its creation. a lot of money spent to create it, for the archaeological excavations and finally opened. A total flop. Happy the many foreigners in the area that VI fitted barbecue Sunday. Happy numerous vandals who have torn away with it. Residents complained that he was not sure. So close. The residents complained that it was closed. Metro C remove them from the pedestrian bridge project that would connect the park to the station of the same name. Alemanno then clear the gypsy camp aidacente but not the park back to life. Rivandalzzato reopened and closed again. Our waste of money. And in fact, there was very little attractive in that place even if you had at least give you time to grow trees. I always thought that if it were to be installed inside a kiosk and possibly a small building to house the offices of local associations always hungry, the park would have been alive and therefore safer and more attractive for families with children. All this for
say that putting the same people in the same context but in new homes will not change things radically. Tor Bella Monaca will be serviced by the metro C in part because it is a very large area to the north. A project of the province provides a corridor of public transport pass that is woven throughout the district by connecting it to FR2, Metro, University of Tor Vergata, down to Ciampino. I would go about this as fluidization of sociality, perhaps the students attracted to the lower rents and transportation should be efficient also to live there, creating social mix that breaks the closure of a ghetto.
Another example. The area of \u200b\u200bthe "towers" is full of archaeological sites, evidence of of the past as the castle of Torrenova. Here, enhance these remains, create educational tours for local schools, put them in the ticketing of Rome's famous sites, this could be another input to create awareness of the territory, a sense of belonging and full human elements that are typically absent in the suburbs.
In conclusion, the replacement building is well in the suburbs, consumption, provided that no new ground and parallel work on mobility, environment and social development from below, avoiding yet another speculation to enrich the usual suspects.
0 comments:
Post a Comment